WARNING: VIEWER DISCRETION IS ADVISED

WARNING:

This week's article contains disturbing images that may be unsuitable for some viewers. VIEWER DISCRETION IS ADVISED.



Thursday, February 4, 2010

"The Free Exchange"

The Free Exchange



C
onservatism’s strength emanates from its penchant for robust debate. “The Free Exchange” is a series of articles aimed at highlighting and broadening the debate at Black and Red. When you comment on essays you read at this site, I will respond to you via this blog series. Hopefully, the free exchange of ideas will prove beneficial to readers and participants. Thank you for reading and thank you so much for commenting.

-J. Thomas Hunter

This week, Greg Ponder Photography addresses: “Misreading Mandates,” and Anonymous comments on “Our Lost Generation.”

Greg Ponder’s comments are in white. Mine are in green.

I look forward to a more lengthy exploration of the Supreme Court's recent ruling. You cite it as a victory, but i cram to understand how this will not be exploited to the detriment of the idea of one man one vote...

Greg, thank you for giving me the opportunity to expound on this subject.

The Supreme Court struck down campaign finance restrictions on corporations and unions. This ruling does nothing to violate “one man one vote” because neither corporations nor unions can vote. What the ruling does is allow corporations and unions to fund campaigns in accordance with the First Amendment.

When you and I donate to campaigns we are expressing ourselves politically. Our donations are public and are therefore public statements that we support a politician and his/her views. We do so because the politician’s policies are aligned with ours. Corporations and unions, too, have interests and thus should be allowed to support candidates with whom they agree.

In other words, should a company be forbidden to support a candidate that supports lower taxes and other policies that would benefit it? Should a union be precluded from financially supporting candidates that honor the secret ballot? If you think so, then you not only disagree with the Bill of Rights’ decree that “Congress shall make no law…prohibiting the free exercise…or abridging the freedom of speech,” but you also disagree with the concept that a company or union should be allowed to support workers’ political interests. Save this ruling, a tax-happy politician (most likely a Democrat) can sweep into office, raise taxes on corporations and force them to lay off workers in order to stay profitable.

The key to appreciating this ruling is to remember that corporations and unions are just conglomerates of people who are interested in exchanging goods and services for a profit with a community. This exchange provides the community with not only goods and services, but also with jobs and social order.

The Supreme Court decision supports that aim and supports the U.S. Constitution.


Anonymous’ comments are in lavender. Mine are in green.

Abortion does affect African Americans and the reason is that it is a eugenically targeted effort to lower the Black population. Abortion is wrong on any unborn child and I am glad that you pointed that out. But the fact that there is a very racist component to abortion needs to be exposed. Check out the 2.5 hour film: Maafa21 Black Genocide in 21st Century America to really expose this in the most direct way possible: http://www.maafa21.com. PS- Thanks for the pics- they tell the truth about this holocaust!

Anonymous, you are definitely correct about the negative impact that abortion has on the black community. Cumulative statistics from the Center for Disease Control and Prevention note that abortion claimed more than 10,000,000 more black lives than did the next big killer of blacks—heart disease—since 1973. The numbers are simply staggering.

I do plan to write about the racist component of abortion. I will talk about Margaret Sanger and the eugenics movement. However, I will also do everything I can to keep the racial aspect of abortion from overshadowing the corrosion abortion does to humanity and to America’s very soul.

Abortion is the callous murder of the most innocent people in the world. Defenseless babies, blighted only by Original Sin, long only to trust and to feel love. It is a horrific deed to mutilate and kill these people, and it is shameful that people are willing to provide refuge for perpetrators of this evil.

Thank you, also, for the link to the movie. I will watch it at my earliest convenience.

Sunday, January 31, 2010

"Our Stolen Generation"

“Our Stolen Generation”
Or
“Confronting America’s Culture of Death”
By: J. Thomas Hunter


Along the way to an exhibit at Loyola University’s Museum of Art, my wife, 5-month-old daughter, uncle and I stumbled upon a pro-life rally taking place some 30 yards from the museum entrance. I was immediately heartened—first, to see people braving Chicago’s punishing January winds to spread the message of life, and second, to see pro-life demonstrators challenging the ultra-liberal culture of President Barack Obama’s home city. My daughter cooed in her covered car seat while we tried in vain to decipher the unintelligible words coming from the lead activist’s bullhorn. Though abortion has claimed more than 13,000,000 blacks since 1973[1], we were the only black people at the rally. As a result, we caught the attention of an activist who approached us to convince us that abortion is a terrible evil that affects black Americans more than anyone else in the nation. We did not need to be convinced—each of us detests abortion, especially, I’m sure, my daughter.

The pro-life activists carried signs that read, “Choose Life” and “Abortion is Murder.” Only a few signs bore the horrifying images of abortions—tiny dismembered, burned and mutilated human bodies. My wife gasped and averted her eyes when she saw one. It was the first time she had ever seen a picture of an abortion.

Despite the images and despite the activists’ non-confrontational style, liberal passers-by shouted at us. One man leaned toward us and yelled, “Pro-choice!” I yelled back. I was appalled that anyone could stand before a photograph of an abortion and still be animated to support such a practice. Does he hate humanity so much that he doesn’t care if babies are mutilated and thrown into dumpsters—relegated to rat feed? Does he hate Christianity so much that he has sworn himself to be against even its most benevolent tenets? Is he so uninformed that he doesn’t know how many people have been slaughtered, or how immediately brain waves and heartbeats develop?

The American Enterprise Institute (AEI) just updated a study that gauges American attitudes toward abortion[2]. AEI compiled hundreds of responses to abortion polls to zero in on a cultural pulse. The findings are both encouraging and disheartening as the study shows that Americans have maintained contradictory views on the issue since 1973. The authors of the study, Karlyn Bowman and Andrew Rugg, note that, “Most Americans do not want to overturn Roe v. Wade. At the same time, however, they are willing to put significant restrictions on abortion.

For more than a year, I had planned to write a series on abortion where I would combat the most common arguments in its defense. This AEI study gives me the perfect platform to do so, because it addresses the very questions about abortion that Americans have been wrestling with for more than a generation. Each poll in the study is clearly categorized such that one could choose a topic and find numerous poll results. For example, the table of contents lists the categories such as “Abortion as Murder, Woman’s Choice, Under What Circumstances, Constitutional Amendment,” etc.”

Though abortion rates have declined 25% since its peak in 1990, a sickening 1.2 million people per year continue to meet their demise by having their skulls punctured with scissors and their brain vacuumed out[3]. The AEI authors write that “Ninety percent of Americans…had never been active in the abortion debate.” This series intends to change that, because too many (37%) Americans do not believe that abortion is murder and too few (only 65%) believe that abortion ends a human life. If preserving innocent human life is important to you, please refer your friends to this series, especially if your friends were disgusted by Abu-Ghraib, consider waterboarding torture and continue to support a Democrat Party that lobbies for abortion—murder—on demand.

Article Sources:
[1] http://www.blackgenocide.org/black.html
[2] http://www.aei.org/docLib/Public%20Opinion%20Study%20-%20Abortion%202010.pdf
[3] http://www.chron.com/disp/story.mpl/front/5461945.html